Saturday, January 1, 2022
Dear Fellow Progressives
When I have a job without paid sick leave, I go to work sick. When I have a job with paid sick leave, I do not go to work sick, but I also take a few “mental health days”. I don’t go hunting, but I do go to the beach. Chances are I am not alone.
The answer to the question of whether many people suffer in
our economy without government assistance or protection is “yes”. The answer to
the question of whether people take advantage of said system is also “yes”. The
question society should be asking is: which is worse?
While suspicious activities perpetrated by a rich wall
street executive or a hedge fund manager would not escape scrutiny, left
leaning politicians appear incapable of even considering the notion that people
who benefit from government intervention exploit the system. The left’s narrative is that poor people are
all hardworking, honest, and pure. They will only take paid sick leave if they
really must. They will only take food stamps if they desperately need it. They
will only buy recreational drugs if they earned the money. Everyone is just like their unassailable
single mom who worked three jobs but still struggled financially.
The right, on the other hand, sees corruption everywhere,
except maybe among wall street executives and hedge fund managers. They call it
like they see it. It is common sense! Humans, mostly poor ones, are innately
shifty. They are selfish, insatiable opportunists. Give them something, and they
will just take more, unlike their parents who worked hard to get ahead,
never took a government “hand-out” and subsequently deserved their inevitable success.
The truth is that these narratives are both fantasies and until
politicians stop embracing this false dichotomy of human nature and experience,
we cannot have rational policy discussions.
The reaction to Joe Manchin’s statement regarding people
spending monetary benefits on drugs or using sick leave to go hunting is a case
in point. The audacity! The shame! Joe
Manchin clearly despises his own constituents. He thinks poor people deserve to
be poor. In the meantime, the party of “common sense” rolls its collective
eyes. They cheer Joe Manchin for stating
the obvious.
I suggest that if the left wants to persuade skeptical
people that a social safety net is necessary in a civil society, they must
start by admitting that humans will take advantage of it. They must recognize
that the doubters are not just talking about flagrant fraud and corruption
schemes, like the ones that make headlines. They are referring to the wide
array of minor misappropriation going on under the radar: the guy who is
sharing half his food stamps with his neighbor, the parent that bought a pair
of earrings with the child tax care credit, and those who could work, but choose
not to, because they can get benefits instead.
If they start with that confession, they can then move on to
the important questions: what is the cost of not having a social safety net?
How do these programs benefit society as a whole? How can the system be made
more efficient?
Vulnerable people certainly need to be defended in a society
that works against them, but not by turning them into gutless lambs. They should
be fully respected as mature adults with agency: agency that will occasionally
take them to the beach on a day they should really be working.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)